Bill W.'s original Grapevine article introducing Tradition Four:
Tradition Four
Copyright © The A.A. Grapevine, Inc., March 1948
Tradition Four is a specific application of general principles
already outlined in Traditions One and Two. Tradition One
states : "Each member of Alcoholics Anonymous is but a small
part of a great whole. AA must continue to live or most of us
will surely die. Hence our common welfare comes first. But
individual welfare follows close afterward." Tradition Two
states: " For our group purpose there is but one ultimate
authority -- a loving God as he may express himself in our
group conscience."
With these concepts in mind, let us look more closely at
Tradition Four. The first sentence guarantees each AA group
local autonomy. With respect to its own affairs, the group may
make any decisions, adopt any attitudes that it likes. No
overall or intergroup authority should challenge this primary
privilege. We feel this ought to be so, even though the group
might sometimes act with complete indifference to our
Tradition. For example, an AA group could, if it wished, hire
a paid preacher and support him out of the proceeds of a group
nightclub. Though such an absurd procedure would be miles
outside our Tradition, the group's "right to be wrong" would
be held inviolate. We are sure that each group can be granted,
and safely granted, these most extreme privileges. We know
that our familiar process of trial and error would summarily
eliminate both the preacher and the nightclub. These severe
growing pains which invariably follow any radical departure
from AA Tradition can be absolutely relied upon to bring an
erring group back into line. An AA group need not be coerced
by any human government over and above its own members. Their
own experience, plus AA opinion in surrounding groups, plus
God's prompting in their group conscience would be sufficient.
Much travail has already taught us this. Hence we may
confidently say to each group, "You should be responsible to
no other authority than your own conscience."
Yet please note one important qualification. It will be seen
that such extreme liberty of thought and action applies only
to the group's own affairs. Rightly enough, this Tradition
goes on to say, "But when its plans concern the welfare of
neighboring groups also, these groups ought to be consulted."
Obviously, if any individual, group, or regional committee
could take an action that might seriously affect the welfare
of Alcoholics Anonymous as a whole or seriously disturb
surrounding groups, that would not be liberty at all. It would
be sheer license; it would be anarchy, not democracy.
Therefore, we AAs have universally adopted the principle of
consultation. This means that if a single AA group wishes to
take an action that might affect surrounding groups, it
consults them. Or, it confers with the intergroup committee
for the area, if there be one. Likewise, if a group or
regional committee wishes to take any action that might affect
AA as a whole, it consults the trustees of the Alcoholic
Foundation, who are, in effect, our overall general service
committee. For instance, no group or inter group could feel
free to initiate, without consultation, any publicity that
might affect AA as a whole. Nor could it assume to represent
the whole of Alcoholics Anonymous by printing and distributing
anything purporting to be AA standard literature. This same
principle would naturally apply to all similar situations.
Though there is no formal compulsion to do so, all
undertakings of this general character are customarily checked
with our AA general Headquarters.
This idea is clearly summarized in the last sentence of
Tradition Four, which observes, "On such issues our common
welfare is paramount."
Copyright © The A.A. Grapevine, Inc., March 1948
Comments
Post a Comment